We are never formally taught how to balance logic and emotion.
Yet from childhood, we’re trained to perform one while denying the other.
For some, emotion was seen as weakness, so we learned to armor up, speak only in strategy, and flinch at the idea of vulnerability. For others, love was so abundant it softened our boundaries, making freedom feel like betrayal and independence feel unsafe.
But what no one teaches us is how to decipher which voice is ours.
The one that cries when ignored, or the one that calculates survival.
Is it our logic speaking, or our wound?
Emotional reactivity disguises itself as urgency.
But urgency, unchecked, becomes sabotage.
In work, in love, in self-worth, we make permanent decisions in temporary states, burning bridges, chasing ghosts, losing sleep over mirages we mistake for meaning.
And we call it passion. We call it being human.
But the real evolution begins when we stop obeying our emotions and start understanding them.
When we stop bleeding into every room we enter.
When we become fluent in the pauses between stimulus and response.
I didn’t learn this in a book. I learned it in the aftermath.
The aftermath of overworking myself into illness because I thought being needed made me safe.
The aftermath of inconsistent relationships, where my silence was mistaken for stability and my emotional labor was extracted like a resource.
The aftermath of therapy sessions where I had to peel back the armor I spent decades building just to realize I was protecting everyone but me.
Rough childhoods don’t just grow strong people.
They grow high-functioning performers who don’t know the difference between discipline and denial.
People who overdeliver. Overplease. Overthink.
And eventually, quietly, unravel.
What saved me was the truth:You can feel deeply and still choose wisely. You can hold heartbreak in one hand and boundaries in the other.
You can cry at night and still say no in the morning.
Therapy gave me language. But more importantly, it gave me clarity.
Clarity on who I am when no one is watching.
Clarity on the difference between being expressive and being exploitable.
Clarity on when I was reacting from my highest self, or from my most wounded timeline.
There is a difference.
Emotional intelligence is not about how much you feel.
It’s about how precisely you translate that feeling into aligned action.
The person I used to be thought logic was cold.
That to lead was to lose softness.
That to be taken seriously, I had to harden.
But the person I’ve become knows the truth:
That logic, when paired with discernment, is the most sensual form of power.
That clarity is a kind of seduction.
That being unshakable is far more intimate than being understood.
And so I changed.
I started holding my emotions with reverence, but not submission.
I stopped explaining myself to those committed to misunderstanding me.
I stopped negotiating with people who only heard me when I cried.
Now, I move slower. I listen longer.
And I lead with logic, not because I’m detached, but because I’ve finally healed enough to not need chaos to feel alive.
So no, I don’t perform emotion anymore.
I don’t hand over my inner world like a resume.
I don’t chase closure from people who lack self-awareness.
I keep my emotions in my pocket.
Not hidden, harnessed.
Because power isn’t being the loudest one in the room.
It’s being the most precise.
And leadership?
It’s not about being in charge. It’s about being in control of yourself.
If you want to build a life that lasts, A career that thrives. A love that respects you.
A self-worth that doesn’t collapse at the first gust of wind, Then learn to pause.
To ask: Is this a truth, or is this a trigger?
To understand that not everything urgent is important, and not everything emotional is wise.
Keep your emotions in your pocket.
Close. Cared for. Disciplined.
Because the person who knows how to feel without drowning…
The one who can hold a boundary with grace, and a standard with silence…
The individual who can choose logic without losing heart…
They are unstoppable.






Leave a comment